Special Education Services Through Age 22 in New York: October 2025 Update

If your child has an Individualized Education Program (IEP) and is approaching age 21, you may have questions about whether they can continue receiving special education services. This is a question we have been receiving a lot lately, and understandably so; the answer has significant implications for families planning their child’s educational future.

This is a rapidly evolving area of New York education law, and we want to share the most current information available to help families navigate this important issue.

Understanding the Age Eligibility Question

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) is the federal law that governs special education services. IDEA requires states to provide a free appropriate public education (FAPE) to eligible children with disabilities “between the ages of 3 and 21, inclusive.” However, IDEA eligibility ends when a student earns a regular high school diploma (though it does not end if the student receives a certificate or other non-diploma credential).

In New York, this federal requirement is codified in Education Law § 4402(5), which provides that a student with a disability who reaches age 21 during the school year is entitled to continue receiving services until the end of that school year (or the end of the summer program if they turn 21 during July or August).

However, a key legal dispute has emerged: does “ages 3 and 21, inclusive” mean services end on a student’s 21st birthday, at the end of the school year when they turn 21, or actually continue through their entire 21st year of life (meaning until the day before their 22nd birthday)?

This question has been at the center of recent court decisions and State Education Department guidance.

The Current Legal Landscape

On July 17, 2025, the New York Appellate Division, Third Department, issued a significant decision in Matter of Katonah-Lewisboro Union Free School District v. New York State Education Department. The court upheld the State Education Department’s (SED) interpretation that students with disabilities are entitled to receive special education services until the day before their 22nd birthday, provided they have not yet earned a high school diploma.

This decision reinforced SED’s Formal Opinion of Counsel No. 242, issued on July 6, 2023, which determined that New York law must be read consistently with federal standards established by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in A.R. v. Connecticut State Board of Education.

October 10, 2025 Memorandum

Most recently, on October 10, 2025, the New York State Education Department issued a new memorandum that significantly strengthens the Department’s position. This memorandum:

  • Reaffirms that school districts must provide a free appropriate public education (FAPE) to eligible students until they earn a high school diploma or until the day before their 22nd birthday;
  • Emphasizes that the Third Department’s July 2025 decision upheld SED’s interpretation “in its entirety”;
  • States explicitly that districts may no longer ignore this obligation;
  • Warns that noncompliance will be considered willful under Education Law §306; and
  • Requires districts to maintain enrollment and services, including placements at State-approved schools.

The October memorandum makes clear that this is no longer an open question. School districts are expected to comply immediately.

What Does This Mean for New York Families?

The State Education Department has taken the position that all school districts in New York must provide services through age 22. Following the Third Department’s July 2025 decision upholding this interpretation and the strongly-worded October 2025 memorandum, SED has made clear it expects districts to comply immediately.

However, it’s important to understand the current legal landscape:

  • The Katonah decision is binding only in the Third Department (covering upstate counties) and could potentially be appealed to the New York Court of Appeals;
  • The State Legislature has not yet amended the Education Law to codify this requirement; and
  • SED is interpreting existing federal and state law to reach this conclusion, backed by the Third Department’s decision.

Despite these ongoing legal questions, the October memorandum warns that noncompliance will be considered “willful” and subject to enforcement. This creates a situation where districts face pressure to comply with SED’s interpretation, even as the legal framework continues to develop.

Given this uncertainty and the strong enforcement language in the recent memorandum, families should take proactive steps to ensure their child’s rights are protected.

Practical Steps for Families

  1. Review Your District’s Policies

    • Check your school district’s Special Education Procedures Manual or Standard Operating Procedures Manual. Some districts, including New York City, have already updated their policies to explicitly provide services through age 22.
  2. Contact Your Special Education Administrator

    • Even if your district has updated policies, reach out to your district’s special education administrator or Committee on Special Education (CSE) directly to confirm that your child will continue to receive services through age 22, ensure there is no confusion about the current legal requirements, and document the district’s position in writing.
  3. Share the State Education Department Documents

    • Provide your district with copies of the SED Formal Opinion of Counsel No. 242 (July 6, 2023), and the updated memorandum from SED Counsel Daniel Morton-Bentley (October 10, 2025). These documents reflect the Department’s official position and carry significant weight in discussions with your school district.
  4. Plan for Transition Services

    • The SED recommends that districts consider providing services through the end of the school year in which the student turns 22, rather than stopping on the student’s actual birthday. This should be part of a larger discussion about your child’s transition from school to post-school activities.
    • Work with your CSE to ensure appropriate transition planning is in place, regardless of when services will end.

Why Is This Issue Still Evolving?

The New York State Legislature has not yet amended the Education Law to provide state aid to districts for educating students with disabilities through age 22.

Additionally, the Katonah case could potentially be appealed to the New York Court of Appeals, which could provide further clarity on this issue statewide.

The Bottom Line

As of October 2025, the law is clear. New York school districts must provide special education services to students with disabilities until the day before their 22nd birthday, provided they have not earned a high school diploma. The State Education Department has made enforcement a priority and has warned districts that noncompliance will be considered willful.

Because this is a dynamic and changing area of law, it is essential to stay informed and take proactive steps to protect your child’s rights.

Need Help?

If you have questions about your child’s eligibility for special education services through age 22, or if your school district is not complying with the State Education Department’s directives, our firm is here to help.

Contact us today to discuss your situation and learn about your legal options.

This blog post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The information provided is current as of October 21, 2025, but special education law continues to evolve. For advice specific to your situation, please consult with a qualified special education attorney.

Cerra v. Pawling Central School District: How IDEA Shapes IEP Requirements

Introduction

This post is a part of our ongoing blog series exploring significant Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) cases. Today, we’ll look into Cerra v. Pawling Central School District (2005). This case provides essential insights into how the Second Circuit interprets the requirements under the IDEA, particularly concerning the adequacy of Individualized Education Programs (IEPs). If you’re new to this series, consider reading our original post which links to posts about the foundational IDEA decisions, like Rowley and Endrew F., which set important legal standards.

Cerra v. Pawling Central School District (2005) – The Background

The Cerra case arose when the parents of a child with a disability disputed the adequacy of their child’s IEP. Under IDEA, public schools must provide children with disabilities a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE). The parents argued that the school’s IEP failed to address their child’s unique educational needs and sought reimbursement for private school tuition.

Continue reading

Endrew F. v. Douglas County: Raising the Bar for Special Education under IDEA

Introduction

As part of our ongoing series looking into key judicial decisions shaping special education law, we previously discussed foundational IDEA cases, including our initial overview, Understanding IDEA: An Introduction to Special Education Law, and Board of Education v. Rowley. Today, we explore another significant advancement through the Endrew F. Supreme Court IDEA decision (Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, 2017). This case clarified and raised expectations for providing a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE), redefining how schools approach educational planning for students with disabilities in the Second Circuit and nationwide.

Continue reading

Understanding FAPE: The Landmark Rowley Supreme Court Decision

Introduction

In our previous post, Understanding IDEA: An Introduction to Special Education Law, we introduced the fundamental principles of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Today, we’re diving deeper into one of the most influential Supreme Court cases interpreting IDEA: the Rowley Supreme Court IDEA decision (Board of Education v. Rowley, 1982). This landmark case shaped the standard for what constitutes a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) and continues to guide special education law in the Second Circuit and nationwide.

Continue reading

Case Review: How Should I Justify My Service Provider’s Enhanced Rates?

Introduction

Many parents rely on private special education service providers when their school district fails to deliver the services their child needs, or even those that are mandated on their IEP. However, when seeking reimbursement or direct funding for private services, the district may argue that the rates charged by private providers are too high. Any rate above the extremely low rates that the NYC DOE pays providers is considered an “enhanced rate.” But how are parents supposed to justify “enhanced rates” at an impartial hearing?

A recent State Review Officer (SRO) decision (24-218) issued in July 2024 helps explain this issue. The case involved a parent who sought reimbursement for Special Education Teacher Support Services (SETSS) provided by EdZone, LLC at a rate of $198 per hour. The New York City Department of Education (DOE) challenged this rate, arguing that it was excessive. The SRO ultimately ruled in favor of the parent, requiring the DOE to fully reimburse the $198/hour rate.

This case highlights key takeaways on how parents can justify enhanced provider rates when school districts refuse to fund them.

Continue reading

Case Review: A Family’s Journey to Tuition Reimbursement

When advocating for your child with special needs, the process can feel overwhelming. This blog post highlights one family’s experience in seeking tuition reimbursement for their child’s placement at the Shefa School in New York City for the 2023-2024 school year. It walks through the arguments made, what the impartial hearing officer (IHO) decided, what the State Review Officer (SRO) decided on appeal, and the lessons parents can learn to strengthen their own cases.

This blog draws on the decision issued by the New York State Review Office in appeal number 24-153. While I was not involved in the case, I regularly review these publicly available decisions as they serve as a valuable resource for understanding the nuances of special education disputes. You can access the full decision by clicking here. This case sheds light on one family’s journey and provides helpful context for others facing similar challenges. Please note that the outcome of this appeal is specific to its circumstances and should be viewed as informational rather than a guarantee of similar results.

Continue reading

How to Seek Funding for a Private School for Your Child with Special Needs in NYC

If you’re the parent of a child with special needs in New York City, navigating the education system can feel overwhelming. You want what’s best for your child, such as a program that meets their unique needs, helps them thrive, and respects their right to a free and appropriate public education (FAPE). But what happens when the public school system isn’t providing that?

The good news is, if your child’s Individualized Education Program (IEP) isn’t appropriate, the NYC Department of Education (DOE) isn’t placing them in the right program, or the DOE isn’t delivering the services listed in the IEP, you might have a claim to seek funding for a private school or program that meets your child’s needs.

Continue reading